The Regulatory Policy Committee (RPC) exists to ensure that regulation promotes growth, is properly evidence-based, and does not harm investment or international competitiveness. A regulatory environment that supports investment in...
...received 122 submissions from over 23 different departments, agencies and public bodies. This is a significant increase from 2020-21 and reverses the previous decline, reflecting an upturn in government regulatory...
...not expressly address the use of the BRF for evaluating regulatory impacts on CSOs. Because impacts on CSOs can differ significantly from those on business, we believe more consideration should...
...not prove that standardised packaging would reduce smoking. The judgment examines in granular detail the qualitative and quantitative evidence relied upon by the Secretary of State, including survey data, focus...
...represent a person or an organisation do not attempt to log on using another user’s account do not make any commercial endorsement or promotion of any product, service or publication...
The Regulatory Policy Committee held an event at the House of Lords on Wednesday 24th January to promote the new Better Regulation Framework and the RPC’s role in it. Around...
...recent government consultation on the BRF does not even mention CSOs. Like businesses, new regulations can have significant impacts on CSOs. But CSOs often experience impacts that differ in nature...
...impose unnecessary costs on business and provide a barrier to growth, for regulation with significant impacts, it is generally a statutory requirement for departments to undertake a Post Implementation Review...
...the best outcomes for the country” The proportion of IAs rejected as not fit for purpose as first submitted increased significantly, but has started to improve Where we judge...
...signals an intention to remove the Business Impact Target (BIT) in its current form, which includes our current role as Independent Verification Body (IVB). After a further year of reporting...