The Regulatory Policy Committee’s rating system explained – and tips for getting it right

Posted by: , Posted on: - Categories: Better Regulation Framework, How RPC helps

We're often asked what makes the difference between a green and red rating. This post explains our rating system, what we look for and how government departments can improve the quality of their assessments.

How a rigorous impact assessment and RPC scrutiny help to defend against legal challenge

Posted by: , Posted on: - Categories: Policy making

The quality of the evidence base – and how rigorously it was scrutinised before the decision was made – can directly affect whether a policy survives judicial review. This blog considers three judicial review cases that highlight the important role that RPC opinions can play.

Why the RPC matters for the UK’s international reputation: for inward investment and for international trade

Posted by: , Posted on: - Categories: International

The quality of a country's regulatory framework is not a purely domestic concern. It shapes trade relationships, influences investment decisions, and signals to international partners whether a country is serious about evidence-based regulation. Our role at the Regulatory Policy Committee (RPC) sits at the heart of that story.

How the Better Regulation Framework promotes competition to deliver affordable prices, innovation and growth

Posted by: , Posted on: - Categories: Better Regulation Framework, Competition

The Better Regulation Framework requires departments to assess how policies affect market competition. Regulations can inadvertently harm consumers and growth by creating barriers for new businesses and innovative competitors. Policymakers should use the CMA's checklist to identify competition impacts and explore alternatives that protect smaller firms and potential market entrants.