...information in comments such as addresses, phone numbers, e-mail addresses or other online contact details, which may relate to you or other individuals do not impersonate or falsely claim to...
...have been tried to measure the burden of regulation. Some focus on the legal texts themselves – the number of regulations, the number and complexity of the words they contain,...
The RPC’s latest IVB report confirms that there has been an alarming increase in the number of impact assessments (IAs) that have been red-rated as “not fit for purpose”. Since...
...an impact of less than £5 million a year) and this exemption also significantly reduces the number of measures required to be submitted for RPC scrutiny and therefore the resources...
...and we encourage the government to allow independent scrutiny of the full range of regulation with the minimum number of exemptions – again, see our previous post. Focus of assessment...
...and delivering Net Zero ambitions. We recognise that the document signals a direction of travel and a number of detailed points are still to be worked out. At this stage,...
...number of IAs are improved during the course of RPC scrutiny is a positive feature of the process and shows the value that independent external scrutiny can add. A frustration...
...and public bodies. This is in line with previous years. There has been a concerning increase in the number of red-rated IAs that are ‘Not Fit For Purpose’, as well...
...better regulation process. We welcome this. It is a timely opportunity to build on what is good about the current system and improve it in a number of important areas....
...to underlying data about the number, size, and activities of CSOs would better enable departments and regulators to produce better IAs. This would aid ministers and parliamentarians in deciding the...
Recent Comments