...to the breadth, depth and relevance of numerical data; neglect of methodologies appropriate to the question (e.g. regression, behavioural modelling, game-theory, systems modelling); little attention paid to selection or instrument...
...RPC's role as a key part of the process. The Committee will continue to be critical in informing our approach to regulation”. We also appreciate the strongly supportive comments in...
...would extend the benefits of independent scrutiny to increasingly important areas of government policy. It would do more to ensure that an evidence-based approach is taken to assessing the potential...
...exempt and not included in the BIT figures. Perhaps most significantly, having a target (and missing it) appears to have had little consequence for decisions about regulation by ministers. Regulatory...
...recent committee meeting. During the meeting, the Minister expressed his appreciation for the RPC’s crucial role in ensuring that government decisions are evidence-based and take into account a wide range...
...evidence? Might alternatives to regulation now be more appropriate? If the current regulation is still required, what refinements could/should be made? Given the importance of ensuring that regulations do not...
...not the IAs have been published). This applies to both primary and secondary legislation. Recent examples (all for primary legislation) include: Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill – we published our (green-rated)...
...water extraction licences. This year’s Business Impact Target score continues to demonstrate that the target would not appear to have had any impact on Government decisions over regulation of businesses....
Recent Comments