...to reform the BIT. Stephen set out what the RPC would like to see in the reformed Better Regulation Framework and that it was important that some of the benefits...
...and reiterated his concerns over Impact Assessments that the RPC has received that have been late, not fit for purpose, or have had sections that are weak or very weak....
...regulations as appropriate. It is therefore vital that the reformed Better Regulation Framework has stronger measures in place to ensure that PIRs are undertaken and that they are acted on....
...intention to reform the Better Regulation Framework so that it can play its part in the delivery of the Government’s plan to ensure that the UK regulates effectively, takes advantage...
...27% ‘weak’ or ‘very weak’. Given the importance of evaluating the effectiveness of regulations, we believe that it is essential that impact assessments contain good M&E plans to ensure early...
...of regulations, we want to reiterate that it is essential that impact assessments contain good M&E plans, to ensure that arrangements are in place to support the post-implementation review and...
...International Trade) had asked if the RPC could extend its role to provide external independent scrutiny of new trade deal final impact assessments (IA). He explained that the RPC had...
...metric to measure business impacts and whether this might be supplemented with a “scorecard” approach to capture the wider impacts of proposals. What do metrics aim to capture? Many approaches...
...the transparency of the process, and post-implementation reviews. Stephen described how the RPC was involved with the development of the new Framework and that the RPC welcomes the changes –...
How much should Government pay for a drug that extends a patient’s life by an average of 5 years? Should Government spend £1 million on a traffic safety improvement that...
Recent Comments