...to meet their objectives. A second spreadsheet has been added to the existing webpage. One of our previous Blogposts explained why PIRs are key to a smarter regulatory framework and...
...and includes suggestions to the new Government on how to make our role even more effective. Over the past 15 years, the RPC has issued over 4,600 formal and informal...
...wide range of stakeholders. We look forward to working with the new Government to achieve improvements to the effectiveness of the BRF in support of their growth agenda and welcome...
...However too often departments have not been submitting Impact Assessments (IAs) in time to allow independent scrutiny of the evidence and analysis before it is submitted to Parliament – sometimes...
...departments on IA ratings Overall 72% of RPC ratings were either ‘good’ or ‘satisfactory’ (the remaining 28% being ‘weak’ or ‘very weak’). However there were big differences between departments. Top...
...that were rated ‘good’ or ‘satisfactory’: Rationale & Options fell from 84% to 71%; Cost-Benefit Analysis dropped from 90% to 76%; Wider Impacts remained the weakest area and dropped from...
...the next year, as travel becomes more feasible, we aim to rebuild our international engagement and continue to drive both multilateral and bilateral relationships to share insights and benchmark approaches....
...impacts of the agreement. Because trade deals are complex with many assumptions, it is quite easy either to overwhelm the reader with too much detail or to present an over-...
...Harvard University[1]. Stephen will be researching the regulatory framework used by Government departments and sectoral regulators in the UK to introduce new regulations and how it could be more effective....
Stephen Gibson today wrote to Lord Hodgson, Chair of the House of Lords' Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee, offering the RPC's formal response to the recommendation in the SLSC report Losing...