...because they are ‘fit’ for different purposes. Domestic IAs are intended to inform regulatory decision-making whereas FTA IAs seek to provide a sense of thinking behind negotiations and the potential...
...and indirect over time or across sectors. To be effective, the metric must be taken seriously and be used as a tool to inform and influence decision making both in...
...publishes guidance and case histories, on the methodological approach to IAs. It will be important to continue to develop these to ensure environmental impacts are robustly and consistently considered. Including...
...HMT and NAO respectively), which tended to prevent deep consideration of how best to meet policy challenges. Even within the RPC domain, some baked in separations are gradually being relaxed:...
...for many years to come. We encourage such stakeholders to respond to the consultation by 1 October 2021, to help the government to finalise a new Better Regulation Framework that...
...to the People’ make similar recommendations to introduce a ‘one-in, two-out’ regulatory duty on all government departments - that is for each regulation that a department wants to introduce that...
...to introduce regulations that increase costs to business if they can clearly assure stakeholders (including business) that these costs are justified by the policy benefits, perhaps because there are significant...
...focuses almost solely on businesses, yet government departments and regulators are expected to use it to analyse impacts on CSOs as well. In our experience, this often results in under-identification...
...related to Grenfell are not subject to independent scrutiny and the associated business costs are not included in the BIT. While we understand that the government may not want to...
...wellbeing in ways that are difficult to quantify but are deeply meaningful. It is also complicated where different QALY values are used in different circumstances – for example NICE uses...
Recent Comments