...to a lack of commitment to meeting the target has been associated with a significant increase in regulatory costs and exemptions for important policy areas (see our previous blog post)....
...HMT and NAO respectively), which tended to prevent deep consideration of how best to meet policy challenges. Even within the RPC domain, some baked in separations are gradually being relaxed:...
...to the People’ make similar recommendations to introduce a ‘one-in, two-out’ regulatory duty on all government departments - that is for each regulation that a department wants to introduce that...
...opportunity to ensure that the UK has an approach to regulation that is as effective as possible, and promotes innovation and growth in the economy. The Better Regulation Framework is...
...signals an intention to remove the Business Impact Target (BIT) in its current form, which includes our current role as Independent Verification Body (IVB). After a further year of reporting...
The Business Impact Target (BIT) was introduced in 2015 in the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act as a way to reduce the cumulative costs of regulation on business. As...
...related to Grenfell are not subject to independent scrutiny and the associated business costs are not included in the BIT. While we understand that the government may not want to...
...because they are ‘fit’ for different purposes. Domestic IAs are intended to inform regulatory decision-making whereas FTA IAs seek to provide a sense of thinking behind negotiations and the potential...
...information in comments such as addresses, phone numbers, e-mail addresses or other online contact details, which may relate to you or other individuals do not impersonate or falsely claim to...
...how they inform decisions about whether to revise or remove a regulation so as to avoid outdated or ineffective regulation remaining in force. While we have published opinions on over...
Recent Comments