...are taking a fully evidence-based approach to decisions on regulation, that they welcome independent challenge as part of that process and that any new costs introduced are the minimum necessary...
...to reform the BIT. Stephen set out what the RPC would like to see in the reformed Better Regulation Framework and that it was important that some of the benefits...
...and reiterated his concerns over Impact Assessments that the RPC has received that have been late, not fit for purpose, or have had sections that are weak or very weak....
...worked with DIT and the Better Regulation Executive (BRE) to develop a checklist of 20 categories of analytical focus that we use as the basis for rating FTA IAs, including:...
...illustrate the importance of specifying purpose, a scorecard may nevertheless be better than a single metric for accountability and informing external scrutiny. We believe that the framework should continue to...
...with only 10% of IAs being rated ‘good’ (Figure 2). This supports the case that we make in our blog post for using the Better Regulation Framework review to make...
...regulations as appropriate. It is therefore vital that the reformed Better Regulation Framework has stronger measures in place to ensure that PIRs are undertaken and that they are acted on....
...to independent scrutiny of Final Stage IAs. Better enforcement of the better regulation system We also support the committee’s recommendation that the Government should enforce the Better Regulation Framework. As...
...but we recognise that there may be alternative, more effective ways of ensuring that PIRs are properly undertaken and acted upon. This could be supported by an explicit requirement to...
...what extent they are impacted by new regulation. The current BRF doesn’t differentiate between businesses and CSOs – the implied assumption is that CSOs are expected to experience the same...
Recent Comments