...(published last week) stated that it would “support the Regulatory Policy Committee to publish data that enables scrutiny of departments’ performance against the Better Regulation Framework”. We believe that the...
...evidence? Might alternatives to regulation now be more appropriate? If the current regulation is still required, what refinements could/should be made? Given the importance of ensuring that regulations do not...
...that they submit high quality assessments on time and hope that the new Better Regulation Framework (BRF), which requires scrutiny at an earlier point in the policy-making process makes this...
...and the Green Book, it highlights that early planning can maximise learning and minimise data collection costs. It can also help ensure that the rationale for intervention is robust. Data...
...RPC has been concerned over many years at departments’ failure to complete PIRs. We are concerned because it means that departments do not have the evidence to correct past mistakes...
...vaccination of workers in health care settings. This came to us after the legislation had been laid and meant that our opinion (which in this case was that the IA...
...households as well as its impact on growth, innovation and competition, then Government is seeking to appoint two new members to the Regulatory Policy Committee (RPC). As the independent Better...
When posting comments, please observe our site participation guidelines: be respectful of others who use this site stay on topic keep comments concise do not use language that is offensive,...
...also provide information about Options Assessments under the new Better Regulation Framework). We hope that the Government will prioritise reviews of existing regulation which is vital to ensure that it...
The RPC’s latest IVB report confirms that there has been an alarming increase in the number of impact assessments (IAs) that have been red-rated as “not fit for purpose”. Since...
Recent Comments