...RPC sees its role as helping to improve the analysis conducted across government to ensure that both ministers and Parliament have the best possible evidence on which to base regulatory...
...Members Daniel Dalton, Stephen Gifford, John Longworth and Andrew Williams-Fry left the committee this year and we wish them the best in their future endeavours. We welcome comments on our...
...the best outcomes for the country” The proportion of IAs rejected as not fit for purpose as first submitted increased significantly, but has started to improve Where we judge...
Before the recent election, the RPC published a Blogpost on the Government’s record on undertaking Impact Assessments (IAs). This showed the huge difference between the best performing departments (like BEIS,...
...(54%, 50% and 47% respectively). Of the four graded categories, ‘cost-benefit analysis’ had the best average ratings (with only 19 per cent of IAs receiving ‘weak’ or ‘very weak’ ratings),...
...properly evidence based. The report recommends (at para 151) that “As a matter of best practice, governments should set out the anticipated impact of regulations made using the affirmative procedure...
...Government’s efforts and ambition in the White Paper and look forward to its speedy implementation to ensure that the UK’s regulatory approach remains one of the best in the world....
...the seven principles, Objectivity, is defined by the Committee on Standards in Public Life as: acting and taking decisions impartially, fairly and on merit, using the best evidence and without...
...happy to discuss further with you or your committee if that would be helpful. Thank you again for your support of the work of the RPC. Best Regards Stephen Gibson...
...(which are then assessed and rated by the RPC). This allows ministers and Parliament to compare different policy options and choose the one that best meets their objectives. Some of...
Recent Comments