...as an increase in IAs submitted late by departments (in some cases where the legislation was already before Parliament). We will continue to engage with departments to try to ensure...
...the pre-consultation stage, although early scrutiny made little difference to our rating of cost-benefit analysis (88% compared to 86%). We continue to argue for mandatory early scrutiny of IAs to...
...2021, we have published red-rated opinions on IAs for eight measures, compared to none between 2016 and 2020. The Impact Assessments we red-rated over the past 12 months (the most...
...out to public consultation and one relates to fracking which is subject to a moratorium. The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) has committed to deliver the outstanding PIRs...
...and includes suggestions to the new Government on how to make our role even more effective. Over the past 15 years, the RPC has issued over 4,600 formal and informal...
...departments on IA ratings Overall 72% of RPC ratings were either ‘good’ or ‘satisfactory’ (the remaining 28% being ‘weak’ or ‘very weak’). However there were big differences between departments. Top...
...that were rated ‘good’ or ‘satisfactory’: Rationale & Options fell from 84% to 71%; Cost-Benefit Analysis dropped from 90% to 76%; Wider Impacts remained the weakest area and dropped from...
...in this report to £5,629.0 million net), the cumulative total for the parliament to date is an increase in direct costs to business of £4,445.2 million net. This compares to...
Enter your email address to: subscribe for updates when new posts are published manage your existing subscription. Submit Please read our privacy notice to see how the GOV.UK blogging platform...
...for the previous two years, the total increase for the parliament to date is £14.3 billion. This compares to the Government’s target of keeping costs constant and not increasing the...
Recent Comments