...final stage of ROAMEF - Feedback - is the one that too often gets missed. Evaluation via post-implementation reviews (PIRs) is supposed to feed back into future policy-making. The cycle...
...followed – which matters when a judge is assessing whether a minister acted reasonably. Three cases, three lessons Standardised tobacco packaging (2016) British American Tobacco v Secretary of State for...
...(BRF) and how the changes may impact Parliamentary scrutiny of new regulatory proposals. The Committee raised a number of questions for Stephen, covering the RPC’s role, how it produces opinions,...
The Regulatory Policy Committee held an event at the House of Lords on Wednesday 24th January to promote the new Better Regulation Framework and the RPC’s role in it. Around...
...the cost reductions achieved. We hope that the Government will achieve its target to reduce administrative costs and look forward to working with them to deliver on this challenging commitment....
...– it is for the Government to decide whether it wants to set itself a target to reduce or minimise the impacts of its regulatory activity. Offsetting metrics like OITO...
...illustrated below. The government uses the MAC approach to identify the carbon value required to deliver sufficient abatement to meet its legally binding targets. Source: Department for Energy Security and...
...prior to full committee review. Depts have 15 working days to revise their assessment and have the opportunity to meet the secretariat to discuss the comments in the IRN. Following...
...Earlier evaluation would be welcomed (although sufficient time needs to be allowed to pass to properly see the impacts of the regulation). However to be effective, PIRs need to be...
...developing effective M&E plans that can inform PIRs, helping to unlock growth and reduce administrative costs. We are committed to working with the new government to enhance the effectiveness of...