...course, its application can be sharpened and adapted. For example, the distinction between direct and indirect impacts within EANDCB is often blurred and could shift if impacts move between direct...
Carbon impacts can feature heavily in the economic appraisal supporting regulatory policy proposals. They can sit on either side of the cost-benefit ledger. Recent impact assessments published with legislation illustrate...
...that they submit high quality assessments on time and hope that the new Better Regulation Framework (BRF), which requires scrutiny at an earlier point in the policy-making process makes this...
...revised. This is the purpose of Post Implementation Reviews (PIRs). Done well, they should: lead to a better understanding of the regulation and the problem it was meant to address...
...plans which should support better and more considered Post Implementation Reviews (PIRs). Stephen explained that the Better Regulation Framework is currently in a 12 month, ‘transition’ period, where departments can...
...to independent scrutiny of Final Stage IAs. Better enforcement of the better regulation system We also support the committee’s recommendation that the Government should enforce the Better Regulation Framework. As...
...represent a person or an organisation do not attempt to log on using another user’s account do not make any commercial endorsement or promotion of any product, service or publication...
...The report details our work with what is now Regulation Directorate in the Department for Business and Trade on the development of the revised Better Regulation Framework (BRF). This contains...
The RPC reviews and rates the quality of impact assessments (IAs) of new regulations produced by government departments. As well as the headline ‘fit for purpose’ rating, we rate IAs...
...not. This scrutiny process helps to improve IAs and therefore supports better policy decisions by Ministers. Under the current Better Regulation Framework, the RPC can formally conclude that a final...