...impacts that are quantified or qualitative or certain vs. uncertain and, critically, impacts that relate directly to objectives and those that are orthogonal to them (e.g. ‘cost to business’ as...
...the actual operation of those measures, it is important to agree in advance what data and evidence is to be collected so that an effective review is possible at that...
...opportunity to ensure that the UK has an approach to regulation that is as effective as possible, and promotes innovation and growth in the economy. The Better Regulation Framework is...
...am pleased to confirm that the RPC now publishes all opinions that we have issued to departments as soon as the relevant (draft) legislation is laid before Parliament (whether or...
...the environment. The wider impacts that are relevant to a policy decision vary from measure to measure, therefore we believe that the BRF should ensure that the wider impacts that...
...the scope of the framework that: are not supported by an options assessment and/or impact assessment that are judged to be fit for purpose by the Regulatory Policy Committee; or...
...that we regulate in a way that is as effective as possible, promoting innovation and growth. The RPC strongly supports these objectives. We see our role as helping the government...
...so that Ministers and Parliament can properly consider whether regulation is required and which option to adopt. In order to ensure that the IAs produced by departments properly assess the...
...to relax this requirement. We understand that this reduces the burden on civil service resources but, again, this means that measures that have very significant impacts on businesses and civil...
...are taking a fully evidence-based approach to decisions on regulation, that they welcome independent challenge as part of that process and that any new costs introduced are the minimum necessary...
Recent Comments