Considering wider impacts when scrutinising Impact Assessments
RPC member Professor Brian Morgan discusses the range of impacts that should be considered in regulatory impact assessment.
How to measure the impacts of regulation on business
Posted by:
Jonathan Cave, Posted on:
-
Categories:
Better regulation, Evaluation, Independent scrutiny
RPC committee member Jonathan Cave sets out some of the issues to consider in measuring the impacts of regulation.
Civil Society Organisations and the Better Regulation Framework
RPC member Laura Cox comments on the differences between civil society organisations (CSOs) and businesses, and considers how the Better Regulation Framework should be applied to CSOs.
Is regulation working as intended?
RPC member Jeremy Mayhew makes the case for effective evaluation of regulation after implementation and suggests how Post-Implementation Reviews (PIRs) might be improved.
Independent scrutiny and the Better Regulation Framework
...to focus on the evidence and analysis relevant to support final decision-making. 2. Scrutiny before parliamentary approval - to confirm the estimate of costs and plan for monitoring and evaluation...
Reforming the Better Regulation Framework
...for many years to come. We encourage such stakeholders to respond to the consultation by 1 October 2021, to help the government to finalise a new Better Regulation Framework that...
The scope of the Better Regulation Framework
...to communicate transparently to business and others their commitment to minimise the burden of regulation – and for holding the government to account for that commitment. Using exemptions, particularly for...
Comments on the Taskforce on Innovation, Growth and Regulatory Reform (TIGRR) report
The government is planning to reform its approach to regulation to ensure that the UK takes advantage of the opportunities offered by our exit from the EU and to ensure...
The case for independent scrutiny of impact assessments earlier in the decision-making process
RPC Chair Stephen Gibson discusses the case for independent scrutiny of impact assessments earlier in the decision-making process.